An open letter to the Belfast Planning Board

An open letter to the Belfast Planning Board: As members of the Belfast Planning Board, you are facing a decision with grave implications for Belfast, Northport and indeed the entire state of Maine: whether to allow Nordic Aquafarms to build a massive industrial fish farm in Belfast. The City of Belfast website states: “The Planning and Codes Department performs a variety of services intended to protect, maintain, and develop an attractive, safe, and healthy environment.” Nordic Aquafarms’ proposed project does none of this. The Nordic project would daily discharge into Belfast Bay 7.7 million gallons of warm effluent, more than 100 pounds of phosphorous and 1,600 pound of nitrogen, all of which threaten algae blooms and popular recreation sites. This threatens tourism, fisheries, and those industries’ jobs. The Gulf of Maine is warming faster than any other marine body of water in the world. Species, including the economically vital lobster, are migrating north. It would be irresponsible to accelerate this warming process. The proposed project would also destroy dozens of acres of beautiful mature forest, wetlands and habitat of at least one threatened species, the extraordinary bobolink bird, which, weighing only one ounce, migrates as much as 12,000 miles a year. The project would disrupt and disburse relatively settled deposits of highly toxic industrial mercury that previously wreaked havoc throughout the entire Penobscot Bay ecosystem, and it would dump mercury-laced sediment atop New Hampshire drinking water. Nordic plans to dig up and truck away thousands of truckloads of carbon-sequestering topsoil and replace it with massive buildings that will sequester no carbon. Nordic plans to burn at least 900,000 gallons of diesel per year. That’s 20,142,000 pounds of carbon dioxide. And that’s just for supplementary power. The project would also use at least 630,000,000 gallons of water from our limited aquifer and watershed, the future of which are already threatened by the climate crisis. As demonstrated repeatedly in other land-based fish farms, there will in all likelihood be problems that will require considerably more water use. Nordic’s water-use projections ignore this. Salmon prices in Europe plummeted 43 percent from mid-June to mid-July, raising profound doubts about the financial viability of this project. What will happen if Nordic is forced to abandon Belfast – after it destroys woods, wetlands and wildlife habitat? So far Nordic has steadfastly refused to post a bond to cover such an eventuality. Two of Nordic’s three existing plants were built in existing industrial areas – the third is small and in a non-recreation area. Nordic’s proposed California plant would be built in an existing industrial site. So too would plants proposed for Bucksport and Millinocket. The Nordic project would degrade the beautiful and beloved Little River Trail by pushing up against it with massive, loud buildings. Thirty-year University of Bergen, Norway professor Are Nyland, perhaps the world’s foremost academic fish farm expert, told me he did not oppose land-based fish farms, but he does oppose such farms built in recreation areas. Nyland said all land-based fish farms should be built in existing industrial areas, not in recreation areas. Nordic promises a tax bonanza, but in Norway, in California and in Belfast, Nordic has taken herculean strides to minimize its taxes and has taken every government dime it can find. It even registered its US operations in Delaware, an infamous tax haven where Nordic has no operations. And jobs? Nordic claims it has hired at least 30 people for Belfast, but very few were living in Waldo County when hired, and many or most of Nordic’s would-be jobs require expertise not found in Maine. Under such circumstances, approving the proposed Nordic Aquafarms project clearly does not “protect, maintain, and develop an attractive, safe, and healthy environment.” But never mind what the City of Belfast website says, I have a 21-year-old son, and I believe we all have a sacred duty to our children and grandchildren to leave them a livable planet. This project betrays that sacred duty. It’s not easy to reject a $500 million project. I don’t envy you. But no one said protecting our precious and vital environment, saving our climate, and safeguarding our children’s future would be easy. Lawrence Reichard Belfast

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

September 15 Nordic Aquafarms letter to The Free Press of midcoast Maine

  To the Editor: The incompetence of Nordic Aquafarms never ceases to amaze. This time Nordic's incompetence surfaced in a September 3 Republican Journal editorial entitled “Our News Coverage Is Not for Sale.” The editorial describes attempts by Nordic to extort more favorable Republican Journal coverage of its proposed $500 million industrial fish farm by threatening to stop advertising in the paper. This is staggering incompetence for a corporation that wants to build $900 million of industrial fish farms in Maine and California. But Nordic's remarkable incompetence extends well beyond its PR department. Indeed, there are many contestants in the Nordic Aquafarms incompetence derby. There's Nordic's failure to adequately assess the subsoil at the site of its Fredrikstad, Norway plant, which has caused that plant to sink into the ground and has apparently forced Nordic to abandon the unit's commercial production in favor of much smaller-scale “resear
Read more

September 17 Nordic Aquafarms letter to The (Belfast, Maine) Republican Journal

  To the Editor: In his September 10 letter to the editor, Belfast City Councilman Mike Hurley states his journalistic credentials and then says “I know journalism when I see it.” Well, I have been a journalist for 43 years, and I was a columnist for The Republican Journal for four-plus years. My first Republican Journal column was entitled “Flying in a Fact-free Zone” - and that is exactly where Mike Hurley is flying. Hurley says The Republican Journal favors the Nordic Aquafarms opposition, but he presents absolutely no evidence. That's not journalism – it's whining. Hurley says Nordic “would pay more taxes than the top 100 Belfast taxpayers.” But Nordic has – in Norway, Maine and California – availed itself of every tax break and sweetheart deal it can find. Indeed, Hurley's city council paid hall rental for Nordic's propaganda shows, and agreed to pay half of Nordic's dechlorination costs for five years, something it never offered Marshall Wharf B
Read more

Troubled Times at The Intercept

 This was published September 16, 2020 at counterpunch.org Troubled Times at The Vaunted Intercept   By Lawrence Reichard               On September 13, the New York Times ran a 2,900-word article on the biggest fuck-up in U.S. leftist media in a long time, perhaps ever.               The piece covered The Intercept's fantastic and presumably unintentional sloppiness in handling the 2017 Reality Winner leak, the fallout from that sloppiness, and the unfortunate culture at The Intercept that seems to persist to this day, despite internal and at least quasi-external investigations into the monumental screw-up.               In 2017, at the age of 25, the unusually-named Reality Winner sent The Intercept a secret report on Russian cyberattacks on American voting software. Now, thanks in large part to The Intercept's gross negligence, Winner, a former linguist at the National Security Agency (NSA), is serving a prison sentence of 63 months. On July 20, 2020, it was
Read more